Banking / BSA-AML · View pitch deck
Your examiner will challenge every SAR sentence. Can you prove where each one came from?
SARForge assembles case data from multiple banking systems, detects suspicious activity typologies, and drafts FinCEN-ready narratives where every claim traces to specific evidence. Cuts SAR drafting from 21 hours to 2.
- 21h → 2h
- SAR drafting time
- 100%
- Source attribution
- FinCEN
- Field-mapped output
- 30 days
- Design partner pilot
The SARForge Platform
One workspace. Every investigation.
Case queue, AI analysis, compliance checks, and FinCEN-ready narratives — all in a single auditable workflow.
Connects to your existing compliance stack
Every SAR narrative claim links to the specific evidence that supports it. No more black-box assertions. No more 21-hour assembly marathons. No more typology gaps.
Source attribution as a standard, not a feature
FinCEN examiners and federal prosecutors trace SAR narratives back to their evidence. If your analyst can't produce the underlying data, the SAR quality fails. SARForge makes attribution automatic — every sentence cites its source before the narrative leaves the draft queue.
- Every claim → evidence ID, date, and amount
- Click any sentence to open the cited source document
- FinCEN Parts I–V pre-populated from the assembled case
Subject Viktor A. Petrosyan executed 15 cash deposits totaling $147,000 across three branches between Jan 4–Feb 19, 2026, each individually under the $10,000 CTR threshold.
The activity pattern is consistent with FinCEN typology: structuring (31 CFR 1010.314) and does not align with the subject's stated occupation on file.
Evidence index
- • bank_statement_q1.pdf · p.4, p.7, p.11
- • kyc_profile.json · subject.occupation
- • tm_alert.json · flagged_transactions[0..14]
Numbers from the real cost of SAR processing.
Every metric comes from actual BSA/AML investigation workflows — not pilot estimates.
21h → 2h
Investigation time reduced by over 90%.
BSA analysts spend an average of 21.41 hours per SAR pulling data from 4–6 disconnected systems — before writing a single word. SARForge assembles the full case file automatically.
100%
Every claim traces to specific evidence.
Every sentence in the SAR narrative cites its source — transaction ID, date, amount, account number, or KYC record — before the draft leaves the queue. No black-box assertions.
Four steps from alert to a FinCEN-ready draft.
Fully automated. Fully auditable. Human-in-the-loop review before anything is filed.
Case assembly
Pulls transaction history, KYC, OFAC, and prior SARs into a unified case file.
Typology detection
Maps activity to FinCEN's 28+ typologies — structuring, layering, smurfing, insider fraud.
Narrative generation
Every claim traces to a transaction ID, date, amount, or KYC record. No black-box assertions.
FinCEN field mapping + human review
Parts I–V pre-populated. BSA officer reviews, edits, and files. SARForge never files.
The BSA/AML Compliance Execution Stack
From raw alert to FinCEN-ready draft. Every claim sourced, every decision auditable.
28+ FinCEN typologies
Structuring, layering, smurfing, insider fraud — each pattern detected and mapped to FinCEN codes automatically.
Multi-system data assembly
Integrates with transaction monitoring, core banking, KYC, and OFAC screening via API into a unified case file.
FinCEN form pre-population
Parts I–V populated from the assembled case. Your BSA officer reviews and files through FinCEN's BSA E-Filing System.
Audit evidence index
Every decision traceable to source data. Complete evidence chain for examiner review and federal scrutiny.
28+
Typologies
SOC 2
Type II
100%
Attribution
Data Sources
Outputs
21 hours per SAR. Four to six systems. One analyst.
BSA analysts spend the majority of their time gathering data, not analyzing suspicious activity. The result is narrative quality that varies by analyst, typology coverage that's inconsistent, and attribution that doesn't survive examiner scrutiny.
21.41h
The 21-hour draft
Analysts spend an average of 21.41 hours per SAR pulling data from 4–6 disconnected systems — transaction monitoring, core banking, KYC, OFAC — before writing a single word.
Quality fail
The black-box narrative
Narratives make claims without citations. Examiners ask where each statement came from. The analyst can't trace it. The SAR fails the quality review.
28+ gaps
The typology gap
Inconsistent mapping of alerts to FinCEN's 28+ suspicious activity typologies produces SAR narratives that don't reflect the actual pattern — leaving the institution exposed.
5 design partner slots. 30-day pilot. SOC 2 Type II certified.
Run SARForge on a handful of real alerts. We integrate with your TM system, validate attribution against your examiners' standards, and deliver a comparison report at the end of the pilot.